timprepscius commented on issue #20985: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/20985#issuecomment-1107513672
Ok. Thanks for this response. Although, I understand my vote to be of basically no consequence - I would vote for MXNet to have an "approved" onnx importer. This is because you can not only verify MxNet's functioning, but also those of other platforms. And you can have relative performance measurements. (everyone runs the same model, who is faster, is anybody incorrect) For instance, MxNet used to have a bug in the CPU version, which affected some work I had with noise removal (I can find the mxnet issue if you'd like). It was really hard to cope with because I assumed MxNet was correct. I only found out MxNet wasn't correct because of the onnx importer. As of now, I'm actually not sure if MxNet has fixed the bug, because I can no longer test. And so, instead I'm using the ONNX runtime, which I could verify. Although I'm not sure of the overhead of the ONNX runtime, which I'm not so happy about. Anyhow, end babble, beep borp. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
