[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15529724#comment-15529724
]
Raf Huys edited comment on NIFI-2615 at 9/28/16 2:05 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi [~apsaltis], we're having the same requirement: we need a TCP connection
where we can write to *and* read from. Transformed to NiFi, that would mean a
PutTCP and a GetTCP.
I found your release of the nifi-standard-nar
(https://github.com/apsaltis/nifi-gettcp/releases). I'm using nifi@1.0.0 now,
and replacing the nifi-standard-nar-1.0.0 with your 0.6.1 gives
{code}
2016-09-28 15:51:18,626 ERROR [main] org.apache.nifi.NiFi Failure to launch
NiFi due to java.util.ServiceConfigurationError:
org.apache.nifi.processor.Processor: Provider
org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.GetTCP could not be instantiated
java.util.ServiceConfigurationError: org.apache.nifi.processor.Processor:
Provider org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.GetTCP could not be instantiated
at java.util.ServiceLoader.fail(ServiceLoader.java:232) ~[na:1.8.0_101]
at ...
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.GetTCP.getLogger()Lorg/apache/nifi/logging/ProcessorLog;
at org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.GetTCP.<init>(GetTCP.java:133)
~[nifi-standard-processors-0.6.1.jar:0.6.1]
{code}
- do you plan to push this GetTCP feature upstream? If not, any reason why?
was (Author: raf.h...@gmail.com):
Hi [~apsaltis], we're having the same requirement: we need a TCP connection
where we can write to *and* read from. Transformed to NiFi, that would mean a
PutTCP and a GetTCP.
I found your release of the nifi-standard-nar
(https://github.com/apsaltis/nifi-gettcp/releases). I'm using nifi@1.0.0 now,
and replacing the nifi-standard-nar-1.0.0 with your 0.6.1 gives
{code}[Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.GetTCP.getLogger()Lorg/apache/nifi/logging/ProcessorLog;
at org.apache.nifi.processors.standard.GetTCP.<init>(GetTCP.java:133)
~[nifi-standard-processors-0.6.1.jar:0.6.1]{code}
- do you plan to push this GetTCP feature upstream? If not, any reason why?
> Add support for GetTCP processor
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-2615
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2615
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core Framework
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 0.7.0, 0.6.1
> Reporter: Andrew Psaltis
> Assignee: Andrew Psaltis
>
> This processor will allow NiFi to connect to a host via TCP, thus acting as
> the client and consume data. This should provide the following properties:
> * Endpoint - this should accept a list of addresses in the format of
> <Address>:<Port> - if a user wants to be able to track the ingestion rate per
> address then you would want to have one address in this list. However, there
> are times when multiple endpoints represent a logical entity and the
> aggregate ingestion rate is representative of it.
> * Failover Endpoint - An endpoint to fall over to if the list of Endpoints is
> exhausted and a connection cannot be made to them or it is disconnected and
> cannot reconnect.
> * Receive Buffer Size -- The size of the TCP receive buffer to use. This does
> not related to the size of content in the resulting flow file.
> * Keep Alive -- This enables TCP keep Alive
> * Connection Timeout -- How long to wait when trying to establish a connection
> * Batch Size - The number of messages to put into a Flow File. This will be
> the max number of messages, as there may be cases where the number of
> messages received over the wire waiting to be emitted as FF content may be
> less then the desired batch.
> This processor should also support the following:
> 1. If a connection to end endpoint is broken, it should be logged and
> reconnections to it should be made. Potentially an exponential backoff
> strategy will be used. The strategy if there is more than one should be
> documented and potentially exposed as an Attribute.
> 2. When there are multiple instances of this processor in a flow and NiFi is
> setup in a cluster, this processor needs to ensure that received messages are
> not dual processed. For example if this processor is configured to point to
> the endpoint (172.31.32.212:10000) and the data flow is running on more than
> one node then only one node should be processing data. In essence they should
> form a group and have similar semantics as a Kafka consumer group does.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
