turcsanyip commented on a change in pull request #4516:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4516#discussion_r616081804
##########
File path:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/api/RemoteProcessGroupResource.java
##########
@@ -829,6 +833,105 @@ public Response updateRemoteProcessGroupRunStatus(
);
}
+ /**
+ * Updates the operational status for all remote process groups in the
specified process group with the specified value.
+ *
+ * @param httpServletRequest request
+ * @param processGroupId The id of the process group in
which all remote process groups to update.
+ * @param requestRemotePortRunStatusEntity A remotePortRunStatusEntity
that holds the desired run status
+ * @return A response with an array of RemoteProcessGroupEntity objects.
+ */
+ @PUT
+ @Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
+ @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
+ @Path("process-group/run-status/{id}")
Review comment:
I checked the existing endpoints and found that
- starting/stopping all processors in a process
group:`/flow/process-groups/{id}`
- enabling/disabling controller all services in a process group:
`/flow/process-groups/{id}/controller-services`
Following the same scheme, I think the new endpoint should be:
`/flow/process-groups/{id}/remote-process-groups`
@tpalfy, @simonbence What is your opinion?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
