noblenumbat360 commented on a change in pull request #5447:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5447#discussion_r740655325
##########
File path:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-prometheus-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/prometheus/util/PrometheusMetricsUtil.java
##########
@@ -101,20 +98,6 @@ public static CollectorRegistry
createNifiMetrics(NiFiMetricsRegistry nifiMetric
final String componentId = StringUtils.isEmpty(status.getId()) ?
DEFAULT_LABEL_STRING : status.getId();
final String componentName = StringUtils.isEmpty(status.getName()) ?
DEFAULT_LABEL_STRING : status.getName();
- // Clear all collectors to deal with removed/renamed components -- for
root PG only
- if("RootProcessGroup".equals(componentType)) {
Review comment:
Thanks for the response.
Removing this code does not cause a regression in PrometheusReportingTask.
The correct behavior is confirmed by the existing tests starting on line 142 in
PrometheusReportingTaskIT.java as well as manually confirmed.
The removed code is no longer needed because a new NiFiMetricsRegistry is
created (line 142 in PrometheusReportingTask.java) before each call to
createNifiMetrics.
This change was introduced in NIFI-7379 Support multiple instances of
Prometheus registries/metrics.
In hindsight, I should have had the removed code as a separate ticket as it
isn't required to be removed to fix the bug I reported in NIFI-8272. Although
it is all related so I did the work together.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@nifi.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
