Nissim Shiman created NIFI-11109:
------------------------------------

             Summary: flow.json/xml modified when using registry client while 
missing nifi-flow-registry-client-nar
                 Key: NIFI-11109
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11109
             Project: Apache NiFi
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Nissim Shiman


If nifi is set to use a registry client and nifi-flow-registry-client-nar is 
removed from lib, the next nifi restart will result in the registry's class 
name (in flow.xml.gz/flow.json.gz) to be modified from 
org.apache.nifi.registry.flow.NifiRegistryFlowRegistryClient
to 
NifiRegistryFlowRegistryClient.

The url property will also be encrypted.

When the nifi-flow-registry-client-nar is returned to lib, and nifi is 
restarted, these changes remain and registry is unreachable using this registry 
client.

Also, if the nar removed was nifi-standard-services-api-nar, then besides the 
above behavior, processors under version control via this registry client may 
also have their dynamic properties encrypted.  These properties remain 
encrypted even after nifi-standard-services-api-nar is returned to lib and nifi 
is restarted.

This is seen with a dynamic property added to GenerateFlowFile (when 
GenericFlowFile is part of a PG under registry version control).

These are edge cases as admins should be very careful about removing nars from 
lib, but it would be good if protections were added to protect flow.xml/json 
from modifications in these situations.
 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to