[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-12192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17784189#comment-17784189 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-12192: -------------------------------------------------------- Commit 5554bab51638b5860a0fd28a7522eba89e7bf893 in nifi's branch refs/heads/main from David Handermann [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=5554bab516 ] NIFI-12192 Added Codecov Reporting with JaCoCo - Added report-code-coverage profile to nifi-assembly for aggregation - Added Codecov reporting to Ubuntu Linux Job in ci-workflow - Added Codecov badge to README.md This closes #7995 Signed-off-by: Chris Sampson <chris.sampso...@gmail.com> > GitHub Action Workflows could better report Tests Results and Summaries > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: NIFI-12192 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-12192 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Chris Sampson > Assignee: David Handermann > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 2.latest > > Time Spent: 1h 50m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Several of the GitHub Action Workflows produce {{JUnit}} XML result output > files through {{surefire}} and {{failsafe}} plugins. These are currently > uploaded as raw logs/XML files for people to download from GitHub, but it > should be possible to upload these results as {{checks}} within GitHub > instead, which would be easier for people to consume and understand what > tests are failing in their PRs. > One possible action to use would be > [test-reporter|https://github.com/marketplace/actions/test-reporter], > although an attempt to use this in NIFI-12177 as part of the new > {{integration-tests}} Workflow failed because it seems we're unable to > {{write}} to the GitHub repo (even with {code:yaml}permissions.checks: > write{code} set within the Workflow definition). This might be an intentional > setting, and could require discussion with the ASF Infrastructure team to > understand whether this is/could be permitted. > Also consider adding test coverage reporting, at least for one of the > ci-integration jobs, see tools such as: > * https://github.com/marketplace/actions/jacoco-report > * https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action (see > https://github.com/exceptionfactory/jagged for example implementation) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)