[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15793142#comment-15793142
 ] 

Joseph Percivall commented on NIFI-3271:
----------------------------------------

The issue of a CRON job schedule running right before the scheduled time was 
already brought up on NIFI-3242. Marking this as duplicate.

> GenerateFlowFile processor creates duplicates with CRON scheduling strategy 
> and Primary node only execution
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-3271
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3271
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Marco Gaido
>            Priority: Critical
>
> The most strange thing about this issue is that it came out only today (we 
> have been running our flow for two weeks), while until yesterday everything 
> worked as expected without any change.
> We have some GenerateFlowFile processors scheduled on a CRON basis, with 
> "Primary node only" as execution. Until yesterday, all FlowFiles were 
> generated accordingly without any issue. Today, instead, they started 
> creating two different flow files. For instance, a processor which should 
> have generated a FlowFile at 8:05:00 am indeed generated a FlowFile at 
> 08:04:59 am and one at 8:05:00 am. Both the FlowFiles have been generated by 
> the Primary node which is the coordinator too.
> The load of the system is quite low, and the heap space utilization is quite 
> low too.
> In the Hortonworks community, I found out another guy experiencing the same 
> issue on NiFi 1.0.0: 
> https://community.hortonworks.com/questions/69734/nifi-100-generateflowfile-processor-creates-duplic.html.
> I can't understand what is happening and which may be the reason of this 
> weird behavior. Do you have any idea?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to