Github user mattyb149 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1407
If we going to add the ability to keep track of dynamic max-value
properties in GenerateTableFetch, then there's really no reason why we can't do
the same for QueryDatabaseTable. I left it out of the original Jira based on
the premise that we wouldn't support max-value columns with incoming
connections, and at that point QueryDatabaseTable would work basically like
ExecuteSQL.
The major difference in this case will be that if there is an incoming
connection, then the fetch processors are purely event-driven, meaning they
will need to be hydrated from upstream to get new results. If there is no
incoming connection, then they will maintain their current behavior of running
on their current schedule to check for new max values. Does this sound ok?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
