lordgamez commented on PR #2035: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/2035#issuecomment-3319153087
On the question regarding the API, I think we should keep it for now. We still had users recently using the old API and I would not want to break those processors as it is not trivial to move the old processors to the new API. Keeping it does not require much more maintenance as the new API is mostly a wrapper around the old one, so most of the codebase would still remain even if the support for the old API is removed. But I agree that we should encourage people to use the common NiFi style python API as it is better designed and also portable between NiFi projects. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
