gresockj commented on PR #10642: URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/10642#issuecomment-3662388343
> At a general level, I'm also concerned about the partial implementation of renaming support. On the one hand, I appreciate the goal of minimal renaming support. On the other hand, having an implementation that doesn't fulfill the contract for all property migration could easily create confusion on what is supported and where it is supported. I see your point here -- it would be confusing as a processor developer to understand what parts of your migration was used in which scenarios. I'll move any remaining discussion to the JIRA issue. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
