[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-15977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18083518#comment-18083518
 ] 

Jakub Bogusz commented on NIFI-15977:
-------------------------------------

[~turcsanyip] (or maybe [~turcsanyi]? :)) Do you have some thoughts? 

> PutSmbFile does not support non-default ports
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-15977
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-15977
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Extensions
>            Reporter: Jakub Bogusz
>            Priority: Major
>
> PutSmbFile & GetSmbFile processors don't expose a property to use a port 
> different than the default. This is not an issue for GetSmbFile, as it's 
> pretty much replaced by ListSmb and FetchSmb and those use 
> SmbjClientProviderService which has a configurable port. But the PutSmbFile 
> has no such alternative.
> It seems it would be hard to migrate PutSmbFile to use the new service in a 
> non-breaking way. Maybe some "Connection Strategy" could switch between the 
> old, processor-managed client and a new client service? Or maybe just a new 
> version of "put" processor would make sense?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to