Github user mattyb149 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2063#discussion_r134486575
  
    --- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-mongodb-bundle/nifi-mongodb-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/mongodb/GetMongo.java
 ---
    @@ -120,12 +123,30 @@ public ValidationResult validate(final String 
subject, final String value, final
             .addValidator(StandardValidators.POSITIVE_INTEGER_VALIDATOR)
             .build();
     
    +    static final String JSON_TYPE_EXTENDED = "Extended";
    +    static final String JSON_TYPE_NORMAL   = "Normal";
    +    static final AllowableValue JSON_EXTENDED = new 
AllowableValue(JSON_TYPE_EXTENDED, "Extended JSON",
    +            "Use MongoDB's \"extended JSON\". This is the JSON generated 
with toJson() on a MongoDB Document from the Java driver");
    +    static final AllowableValue JSON_NORMAL = new 
AllowableValue(JSON_TYPE_NORMAL, "Normal JSON",
    +            "Use Jackson to convert the MongoDB Document into a 
representation that uses only standard JSON");
    +    static final PropertyDescriptor JSON_TYPE = new 
PropertyDescriptor.Builder()
    +            .allowableValues(JSON_EXTENDED, JSON_NORMAL)
    +            .defaultValue(JSON_TYPE_EXTENDED)
    +            .displayName("JSON Type")
    +            .name("json-type")
    +            .description("By default, MongoDB's Java driver returns 
\"extended JSON\". Some of the features of this variant of JSON" +
    +            " may cause problems for other JSON parsers that expect only 
standard JSON types and conventions. This configuration setting " +
    +            " controls whether to use extended JSON or provide a clean 
view that conforms to standard JSON.")
    +            .expressionLanguageSupported(false)
    +            .build();
    --- End diff --
    
    Another nitpick :)  Although there are only two allowable values and the 
default is one of them, for consistency this field should be required(true).
    
    Also do you think it would be helpful to add some/all of this description 
to the processor's CapabilityDescription too? That description is pretty thin, 
and this is a nice added feature so might be good to draw more attention to it 
:)


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to