[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16269151#comment-16269151
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-4642:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user joewitt opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2303

    NIFI-4642 updated tests to be more tolerant/variable to different sys…

    …tem speeds.  Many of these should be integration tests and not unit tests
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number 
you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?
    
    - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn 
-Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main 
LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main 
NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to 
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/joewitt/incubator-nifi NIFI-4642

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2303.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2303
    
----

----


> Unstable nifi core build due to validate process scheduler test
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-4642
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4642
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>            Reporter: Joseph Witt
>            Assignee: Joseph Witt
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-NIFI-4642-updated-tests-to-be-more-flexible-in-timin.patch
>
>
> Tests run: 16, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 2, Time elapsed: 34.747 sec 
> <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.nifi.controller.scheduling.TestProcessorLifecycle
> validateProcessScheduledAfterAdministrativeDelayDueToTheOnScheduledException(org.apache.nifi.controller.scheduling.TestProcessorLifecycle)
>   Time elapsed: 3.147 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: null
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:52)
>       at 
> org.apache.nifi.controller.scheduling.TestProcessorLifecycle.validateProcessScheduledAfterAdministrativeDelayDueToTheOnScheduledException(TestProcessorLifecycle.java:372)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to