Github user ijokarumawak commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2777
  
    Thanks @markap14 for pointing that. Separating the coordinate and context 
make sense and implementations will be cleaner by doing so. Although I agree 
with the idea, let me try to explain why I wanted to put everything into the 
same map.
    
    I wanted to muddle all variables into the same map because some lookup 
target, such as URL for the RestLookupService have both lookup coordinate and 
environment depending part that can be passed as FlowFile attributes or 
variable registry.
    
    For example, let's say we want to make following URL to be populated by a 
Expression Language to be used by RestLookupService. 
`http://test.example.com:8080/service/john.smith/friend/12345`
    I think the URL has both lookup and contextual part in it.
    
    - `john.smith and `12345` are lookup coordinates that vary from input, in 
LookupRecord context, it varies per recocrd
    - But hostname and port is more of contextual values, that varies per 
FlowFile or environment
    
    If the URL property is configured as 
`http://${apiHost}:${apiPort}/service/${userName}/friend/${friendId}`, and if 
it can only refer lookup coordinate, then `apiHost` and `apiPort` need to be 
set for each record lookup. And to do so, user need to configure dynamic 
properties at LookupRecord processor using record paths, which can be awkward 
since RecordPathValidator doesn't allow literal String value. A work-around is 
to use `concat('test.example.com')` to return the constant value for every 
record lookup.
    
    To make this scenario more flexible while meeting with the idea of 
separating lookup coordinates and context, I wrote MikeThomsen/nifi#1  so that 
target URL can be configured by 2 properties (if necessary). `BASE_URL` can use 
Variable Registry, and `URL` can use coordinate.
    
    If we pursue the path to separate lookup and coordinate more 
implementations like that will be needed in different places. That has both 
pros / cons I think. 
    
    On the other hand, the variables those can be referred by an EL is already 
muddled a lot IMHO. It contains System properties, Variable registry, and 
FlowFile attribute values and EL can utilize those without knowing where it's 
configured.
    
    Adding those values into lookup coordinate may not sound that wrong, if we 
keep the consistent overlaying order.


---

Reply via email to