[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Josef Zahner resolved NIFI-5882.
--------------------------------
    Resolution: Not A Bug

Works as expected

> Connector Prioritizers doesn't work together with Load Balance Strategy
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5882
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5882
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.0
>         Environment: Centos 7.5, Secured 8 Node NiFi Cluster
>            Reporter: Josef Zahner
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: connector_config.png, queue_with_one_processor.png, 
> queue_with_two_processors.png, template_overview.png
>
>
> For my template please check the picture "template_overview.png". On the left 
> hand side the working (two processor) example and on the right hand side the 
> not working one (one processor).
> I have a ListSFTP Processor which reads files from 4 different folders. In 
> the filename of the files is a number (epochtime) which I'm parsing and set 
> it as "priority" attribute. We have a cluster, so I what I want to achieve 
> for the FetchSFTP is, that the files are fetched in order and are equally 
> distributed over our 8-node cluster.
> However, it seems that if I'm combining to set the "priority" attribute on an 
> UpdateAttribute processor and on the directly attached connector use the 
> following features:
>  * Load Balance Strategy: Round Robin
>  * Select Prioritizers: PriorityAttributePrioritizer
> the prioritizers doesn't seem to have any impact. 
> If i'm setting the priority attribute on an extra processor and use there 
> only the prioritizer - all files are in order but still on the primary node. 
> On the next processor then I'm setting the loadbalancing strategy for the 
> cluster (and add another attribute, but doesn't matter) and the prioritizer 
> together. That way it works. A picture of the queue for both examples is 
> attached (queue_with_one_processor & queue_with_two_processors.png).
> *To sum up*, it seems if I'm setting the "priority" attribute on an 
> UpdateAttribute processor and directly try to use it on the attached 
> connector with a loadbalancing strategy and the prioritizer 
> (PriorityAttributePrioritizer) then the priority attribute doesn't work as 
> expected. If I'm setting the "priority" attribute on a separate processor and 
> then do on an additional processor the magic load balancing strategy stuff 
> together with the prioritizer then it works. 
> Cheers



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to