[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16760136#comment-16760136
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on NIFI-5997:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 83ac191736e8036f82da467ceb1940b50d9886f0 in nifi's branch 
refs/heads/master from Mark Payne
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;h=83ac191 ]

NIFI-5997: If we swap out data, ensure that we do not increment the size of the 
queue by the size of the data that we failed to swap out. Also, if the FlowFile 
Repo does not know about a given swap file, do not restore it on restart

This closes #3290.

Signed-off-by: Bryan Bende <bbe...@apache.org>


> If swap file written but FlowFile Repository fails to update, connection 
> queue counts wrong and flowfiles are duplicated upon restart
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5997
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5997
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Mark Payne
>            Assignee: Mark Payne
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> If a queue writes out a Swap File but then the FlowFile Repository throws an 
> Exception when attempting to update, we end up with a scenario where the size 
> of the queue increases by 10,000 FlowFiles (the number of FlowFiles to be 
> written to the swap file) as well as the corresponding size of the FlowFiles. 
> We also have a Swap File that is written out to disk but the FlowFile Repo 
> didn't get updated so on restart we have those FlowFiles in the FlowFile Repo 
> as well as in the Swap File, so we end up with two of the same FlowFile. This 
> can then cause some odd behavior because two FlowFiles exist with the same ID 
> and the counts on the queues are very wrong, which also causes a lot of 
> confusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to