[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16905535#comment-16905535 ]
Joseph Witt commented on NIFI-4775: ----------------------------------- Regarding my concern that this wasn't reviewed by a committer and has already been committed...we've never really formalized the view. But in general the opinion seems to be this is allowed. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8562e182af3673bee0dfb567b2436693d9e3a00f98346575d8def4a6@%3Cdev.nifi.apache.org%3E So please ignore that concern for now. I am focused on the others though > Allow FlowFile Repository to optionally perform fsync when writing CREATE > events but not other events > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: NIFI-4775 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4775 > Project: Apache NiFi > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core Framework > Reporter: Mark Payne > Assignee: Brandon DeVries > Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.10.0 > > Attachments: RocksDBFlowFileRepo.html, rocksdb-flowfile-repo.adoc > > Time Spent: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Currently, when a FlowFile is written to the FlowFile Repository, the repo > can either fsync or not, depending on nifi.properties. We should allow a > third option, of fsync only for CREATE events. In this case, if we receive > new data from a source we can fsync the update to the FlowFile Repository > before ACK'ing the data from the source. This allows us to guarantee data > persistence without the overhead of an fsync for every FlowFile Repository > update. > It may make sense, though, to be a bit more selective about when do this. For > example if the source is a system that does not allow us to acknowledge the > receipt of data, such as a ListenUDP processor, this doesn't really buy us > much. In such a case, we could be smart about avoiding the high cost of an > fsync. However, for something like GetSFTP where we have to remove the file > in order to 'acknowledge receipt' we can ensure that we wait for the fsync > before proceeding. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016)