[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

James Kosin reassigned OPENNLP-471:
-----------------------------------

    Assignee: James Kosin
    
> DictionaryNameFinder has HASHing issues
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENNLP-471
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-471
>             Project: OpenNLP
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Name Finder
>            Reporter: James Kosin
>            Assignee: James Kosin
>              Labels: dictionary, namefinder
>             Fix For: tools-1.5.3
>
>
> The DictionaryNameFinder has issues finding multi-token names when the 
> dictionary is searched a token at a time by the find() method.  If, the 
> dictionary doesn't have a single (or shorter) token match available in the 
> dictionary.
> Having a dictionary with {"folic", "acid"} without an entry for {"folic"} 
> will cause the find() method to totally skip the fact there is a longer match 
> possible.
> Thanks to Jim for pushing this and to my debugging skills to find.
> Two possiblilites come to mind:
> 1)  I don't really like, is we turn it into a larger problem by trying longer 
> matches when shorter ones don't match.  Unfortunately, this turns quickly 
> into a race to see who can wait longer.
> 2)  A way of returning a possible match that may need exploring, or a 
> look-ahead type system to say we don't match "folic" but if you have "acid" 
> after "folic" we have a match for that in the dictionary.
> 3)  Leave it as is and modify the dictionary to add shorter terms to the 
> dictionary... maybe marking as not-a-valid entry so we can know we need a 
> longer match.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to