https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118213

risch <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #76637|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #7 from risch <[email protected]> ---
Created attachment 80201
  --> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=80201&action=edit
further simplified example

I tested with OOo v3.4 but the issue remains:
When capsulating more than two "IF" clauses in a matrix formula, the outer "IF"
clauses are not interpreted.

Task: The rox should return empty if the corresponding E3:E425 row is empty.

Example with two capsulated IF-clauses:
G3:G425 (matrix) behaves like F3:F425 (non-matrix).
-> no problem

Example with three capsulated IF-clauses:
I3:I425 (matrix) assumes all IF-clauses to be false and always returns the
false part of the inner IF clause
-> this is a matrix bug as if does not happen with normal formula (H3:H425) or
in a matrix with only two capsulated IF claused (G3:G425)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to