https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
--- Comment #17 from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann <o...@apache.org> ---
I had some deeper investigation on the root cause.
My results are:
Our so-called 'model from OOXML' (file model.xml) contains the following
definition:
<define name="CT_MarkupRangeBookmark">
<attribute name="id">
<text/>
<xs:documentation>Annotation Identifier</xs:documentation>
</attribute>
<ref name="CT_MarkupRange"/>
</define>
But via complex type "CT_MarkupRange" it inherits the definition from complex
type "CT_Markup" whose definition is:
<define name="CT_Markup">
<attribute name="id">
<ref name="ST_DecimalNumber"/>
<xs:documentation>Annotation Identifier</xs:documentation>
</attribute>
</define>
With leads to the following generated code in OOXMLFactory_wml.cxx:
case NN_wml|DEFINE_CT_MarkupRangeBookmark:
// CT_Markup
(*pMap)[NS_wordprocessingml|OOXML_id] = NS_ooxml::LN_CT_Markup_id;
// CT_MarkupRange
(*pMap)[NS_wordprocessingml|OOXML_displacedByCustomXml] =
NS_ooxml::LN_CT_MarkupRange_displacedByCustomXml;
// CT_MarkupRangeBookmark
(*pMap)[NS_wordprocessingml|OOXML_id] = NS_rtf::LN_IBKL;
break;
and
case NN_wml|DEFINE_CT_MarkupRangeBookmark:
// CT_Markup
(*pMap)[NS_wordprocessingml|OOXML_id] = AttributeInfo(RT_Integer,
NN_wml|DEFINE_ST_DecimalNumber);
// CT_MarkupRange
(*pMap)[NS_wordprocessingml|OOXML_displacedByCustomXml] =
AttributeInfo(RT_List, NN_wml|DEFINE_ST_DisplacedByCustomXml);
// CT_MarkupRangeBookmark
(*pMap)[NS_wordprocessingml|OOXML_id] = AttributeInfo(RT_String, 0);
break;
==> duplicate attribute info for attribute id
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
