https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124661
--- Comment #12 from Armin Le Grand <[email protected]> --- Hi Steve, thanks for the infos. I am surprised (well, not too much) that it was defined to be limited from the start. What I wanted to point at is that comparing to that is okay, but when only 20 entries are used, one referring 21 is already wrong, too (AFAIK). Would it not be better to compare to the minimum of the limit of 128 and the (hopefully known) number of entries in the current formula list in the fix? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all issue changes.
