https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117900
nick.g...@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
Resolution|DUPLICATE |WONTFIX
--- Comment #12 from nick.g...@gmail.com ---
I'm provisionally changing this back to 'verified', from 'resolved'. I would
be grateful if people could advise on how this issue should be classified. If,
in fact, it has genuinely been resolved I would be happy to set it back. As of
now, however, the issue does not appear to have been resolved.
This bug was marked as a duplicate of issue 30216. On its face, that seems
incorrect:
- Issue 30216 is a feature request for a user-definable date format.
- This issue is a problem in which one standard date format changes to another
and different standard date format without user action.
The two issues seem to have little in common, other than that they both involve
date formats. It is possible that issue 30216 has now been resolved in such a
way that the date format architecture is greatly altered and this issue has
been fixed in the process. If this is the case, however, it would seem logical
to mark this issue as 'fixed' rather than 'duplicate'.
As of now, we have multiple reports of this issue being reproducible across
multiple platforms. It seems to be unresolved, so I am setting the status back
to 'verified'.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
You are the assignee for the issue.
You are watching all issue changes.
