https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125743
--- Comment #12 from Jim DeLaHunt <from.bugzilla_apa...@jdlh.com> --- Sorry, I don't understand what you mean with your comment #10: >... the parameters of INDEX() are not operands of a mathematical term > rather than positional parameters *for* an operand. There is a distinction I learned in programming class between formal parameters (names which are place-holders in the function definition) and actual parameters (the specific values which the software uses when executing a specific call to the function). Maybe that's what you are trying to express by "operands" and "positional parameters *for* and operand". But I'm afraid I don't see how to apply that interpretation to subsection 2.2.1 of the specification. Could you clarify, please? And if you don't want to have a discussion in the issue comments, perhaps bring your comment to the forum topic? "What is correct INDEX() behaviour in array context?" <https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=72871>. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the issue. You are watching all issue changes.
