ningyougang commented on code in PR #170:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/170#discussion_r928367775
##########
tests/src/test/scala/runtime/actionContainers/ActionLoopGoContainerTests.scala:
##########
@@ -135,4 +135,27 @@ abstract class ActionLoopGoContainerTests
c.run(helloMsg()) should be(okMsg("hello-Hello", "Hello, Demo!"))
}
}
+
+ it should "support return array result" in {
+ val helloArrayGo = {
+ s"""
+ |package main
+ |
+ |func Main(obj map[string]interface{}) []interface{} {
+ | result := []interface{}{"a", "b"}
+ | return result
+ |}
+ |
+ """.stripMargin
+ }
+ val src = ExeBuilder.mkBase64SrcZip(
+ Seq(
+ Seq(s"main.go") -> helloArrayGo
+ ))
+ withActionLoopContainer { c =>
+ c.init(initPayload(src))._1 shouldBe (200)
+ val result = c.run(JsObject())
+ result._1 shouldBe (200)
Review Comment:
Nomally, the test case here should compare the result as well. e.g.
```
withActionLoopContainer { c =>
c.init(initPayload(src))._1 shouldBe (200)
val result = c.runForJsArray(JsObject())
result._1 shouldBe (200)
result._2.get.elements shouldBe Vector(JsString("a"), JsString("b"))
}
```
But `c.runForJsArray(JsObject())` depend on openwhisk and this method is
implelment in this pr:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5290/files#r926350523
Due to doesn't know the merge time for openwhisk/pull/5290, so currently,
just compare the code here.
If 5290 merged, i will add logic(compare the result) for this test case
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
