agcom commented on PR #556:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/556#issuecomment-1849944334
Why this pull request is even accepted?
I spent a considerable amount of time to figure out `apiHostName` should be
`$(minikube ip)` when deploying on a Minikube cluster; here is my
`mycluster.yaml`:
```yaml
whisk:
ingress:
type: NodePort
apiHostName: 192.168.49.2 # Replace with your $(minikube ip).
apiHostPort: 31001
nginx:
httpsNodePort: 31001
affinity:
enabled: false
toleration:
enabled: false
invoker:
options: "-Dwhisk.kubernetes.user-pod-node-affinity.enabled=false"
```
I could have helped to polish the "non-maintained documentation on
minikube"; isn't that what open source is?
Are there any other reasons behind this PR except some hate on Minikube and
the "non-maintained documentation" excuse?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
