zabetak commented on code in PR #1421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/orc/pull/1421#discussion_r1115772860
##########
java/examples/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -53,16 +53,33 @@
<groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
<artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId>
<scope>compile</scope>
+ <exclusions>
+ <exclusion>
+ <groupId>log4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
+ </exclusion>
+ </exclusions>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
<artifactId>hadoop-hdfs</artifactId>
<scope>compile</scope>
+ <exclusions>
+ <exclusion>
+ <groupId>log4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
+ </exclusion>
+ </exclusions>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.hive</groupId>
<artifactId>hive-storage-api</artifactId>
</dependency>
+
+ <dependency>
+ <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
Review Comment:
I noticed that slf4j-simple is declared at `compile` scope in the main
`pom.xml`. Would't be sufficient to have it at `runtime` scope?
##########
java/examples/pom.xml:
##########
@@ -53,16 +53,33 @@
<groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
<artifactId>hadoop-common</artifactId>
<scope>compile</scope>
+ <exclusions>
+ <exclusion>
+ <groupId>log4j</groupId>
+ <artifactId>log4j</artifactId>
+ </exclusion>
+ </exclusions>
Review Comment:
Isn't it better to put the exclusions in the main `pom.xml` file so that we
don't have to define them for every module?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
