elek commented on a change in pull request #1419:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/1419#discussion_r520646534
##########
File path: hadoop-hdds/docs/content/design/storage-class.md
##########
@@ -19,10 +19,331 @@ author: Marton Ele
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License. See accompanying LICENSE file.
-->
+
+
# Abstract
-Proposal suggest to introduce a new storage-class abstraction which can be
used to define different replication strategies (factor, type, ...) for
different bucket/keys.
+One of the fundamental abstraction of Ozone is the _Container_ which used as
the unit of the replication.
+
+Containers have to favors: _Open_ and _Closed_ containers: Open containers are
replicated by Ratis and writable, Closed containers are replicated with data
copy and read only.
+
+In this document a new level of abstraction is proposed: the *storage class*
which defines which type of containers should be used and what type of
transitions are supported.
+
+# Goals / Use cases
+
+## [USER] Simplify user interface and improve usability
+
+Users can choose from an admin provided set of storage classes (for example
`STANDARD`, `REDUCED`) instead of using implementation specific terms
(`RATIS/THREE`, `RATIS/ONE`)
+
+Today the users should use implementation spefific terms when key is created:
+
+```
+ozone sh key put --replication=THREE --type=RATIS /vol1/bucket1/key1
source-file.txt
+```
+
+There are two problems here:
+
+ 1. User should use low-level, technical terms during the usage. User might
not know what is `RATIS` and may not have enough information to decide the
right replication scheme.
+
+ 2. The current keys are only for the *open* containers. There is no easy way
to add configuration which can be used later during the lifecycle of
containers/keys. (For example to support `Ratis/THREE` --> `Ratis/TWO`)
+
+With the storage-class abstraction the complexity of configuration can be
moved to the admin side (with more flexibility). And user should choose only
from the available storage-classes (or use the default one).
+
+Instead of the earlier CLI this document proposes to use an abstract
storage-class parameter instead:
+
+```
+ozone sh key put --storage-class=STANDARD /vol1/bucket1/key1 source-file.txt
+```
+
+## [USER] Set a custom replication for a newly created bucket
+
+A user may want to set a custom replication for bucket at the time of
creation. All keys in the bucket will respect the specified storage class
(subject to storage and quota availability). E.g.
+
+```
+ozone sh bucket create --storage-class=INFREQUENT_ACCESS
+```
+
+
+Bucket-level default storage-class can be overridden for any key, but will be
used as default.
+
+
+## [USER] Fine grained replication control when using S3 API
+
+A user may want to set custom replication policies for any key **which
uploaded via S3 API**. Storage-classes are already used by AWS S3 API. With
first-class support of the same concept in Ozone users can choose from the
predefined storage-classes (=replication rules) with using AWS API:
+
+
+```
+aws s3 cp --storage-class=REDUCED file1 s3://bucket/file1
+```
+
+
+## [USER] Set the replication for a specific prefix
+
+A user may want to set a custom replication for a specific key prefix. All
keys matching that prefix will respect the specified storage class. This
operation will not affect keys already in the prefix (question: consider
supporting this with data movement?)
+
+```
+ozone sh prefix setClass --storage-class=REDUCED /vol1/bucket1/tmp
+```
+
+Prefix-level default storage-class can be overridden for ay key, but will be
used as default.
+
+## [ADMIN/DEV] Support multiple replication schemes
+
+Today there are two replication schemes which are hard coded in the code.
Storage-class abstraction extends this behavior to support any number of
replication schemes.
+
+Keys (and containers) can be categorized by storage-class which determines the
replication scheme.
+
+## [ADMIN/USER] Flexible administrations
+
+As it's mentioned above, today it's hard to configure the details of the
replications for key/bucket level. The only thing what we can define is the
replication type for open containers (RATIS/THREE or RATIS/ONE) which
determines the later lifecycle of the keys/containers.
+
+Any specific replication configuration can be configured only on cluster level
and not on key level.
+
+A storage-class can define all the parameters for the spefific containers/keys:
+
+As an example this could be a storage-class definitions:
+
+```
+name: STANDARD
+states:
+ - name: open
+ replicationType: RATIS
+ repliationFactor: THREE
+ - name: closed
+ replicationType: COPY
+ repliationFactor: TWO
+ rackPolicy: different
+ transitions:
+ - target: ec
+ trigger:
+ ratio: 90%
+ used: 30d
+ - name: ec
+ codec: Reed-Solomon
+ scheme:
+ data: 6
+ parity: 3
+```
+
+This defines a replication scheme where only two replicas are enough from
closed containers, and container will be erasure encoded under the hood if the
90% of the content is not used in the last 30 days.
+
+Please note that:
+
+ * All the low-level details of the replication rules can be configured here
by the administrators
+ * Configuration is not global and not cluster-level, one can have different
configuration for different storage-classes (which means for different
keys/containers)
+ * Users dont' need to face with these details as they can use the
storage-class (or just use the pre-created buckets and use default
storage-class) abstraction
+
+## [DEV] Give flexibility to the developers
+
+Storage-class abstraction provides an easy way to plug in newer replication
schemes. New type of replications (like EC) can be supported easily as the
system will be prepared to allocate different type of containers.
+
+## [ADMIN] Better upgrade support
+
+Let's imagine that a new type of Open container replication is introduced
(`RATIS-STREAM/THREE` instead of `RATIS/THREE`). If storage-classes are stored
with the keys and containers instead of the direct replication rules we can:
+
+ 1. Easily change the replicaiton method of existing buckets/keys
+ 2. Turn on experimental features for specific buckets
+
+
+## [ADMIN] Change the cluster-wide replication
+
+An admin may decide to set a custom policy for an entire cluster.
+
+```
+ozone sh prefix setClass --storage-class=EC_6_3 /
+```
+
+# Unsupported use cases
+
+The following use cases are specifically unsupported.
+
+## [USER] Change the replication policy for a pre-existing key
+
+Changing the replication policy for a pre-existing key will require data
movement and reauthoring containers and hence it is unsupported.
Review comment:
Line 48 is the following:
> . The current keys are only for the *open* containers. There is no easy
way to add configuration which can be used later during the lifecycle of
containers/keys. (For example to support `Ratis/THREE` --> `Ratis/TWO`)
Sorry if it was not clear, but it's not about the dynamic change, but
configurability. To make the closed replication factor configurable with the
current approach you may need new CLI parameters:
```
ozone sh key put --replication=THREE --closed-replication=TWO --type=RATIS
/vol1/bucket1/key1 source-file.txt
```
With each of the new configurable options (which are per-key configurations)
we should introduce new CLI parameters. Storage-class simplifies it.
This location talks about the changing of replication mechanism of one key.
It's not easy beacuse it requires rewrite of the containers.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
