ivandika3 commented on PR #6989: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/6989#issuecomment-4353095024
> Regarding Phase 2, just thinking ahead — would it make sense to initially target a simpler mover-style implementation (similar in spirit to HDFS Mover) before introducing a separate job worker subsystem? That might allow basic Storage Policy Migration functionality to be delivered earlier and iterated on over time. @greenwich Yes, we can first implement a standalone StoragePolicySatisfier (similar to HDFS Mover or HDFS StoragePolicySatisfier) without needing to implement a separate subsystem. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
