fmorg-git commented on code in PR #11053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/11053#discussion_r3963526702


##########
hadoop-hdds/docs/content/design/s3-object-lock.md:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+---
+title: S3 Object Lock
+summary: Design to support S3 object lock.
+date: 2026-08-18
+jira: HDDS-15945
+status: accepted
+author: Chung En Lee
+---
+<!--
+  Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+  you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+  distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+  limitations under the License. See accompanying LICENSE file.
+-->
+
+# S3 Object Lock Design Doc
+
+## Summary
+
+This design document aims to plan and implement the Object Lock mechanism for 
OBS buckets integrated with Ranger.
+The primary objective is to provide data immutability and tamper-proof 
protection through the object locking feature.
+
+## Problem statement
+
+With growing demands for data security and compliance, ensuring that critical 
data stored in OBS (Object Storage) is
+protected from accidental or malicious deletion and overwriting has become an 
essential system protection requirement.
+To establish a more rigorous data protection mechanism, we plan to introduce 
the Object Lock feature.
+
+Considering the current system architecture and access control strategies,
+this design integrates with existing Apache Ranger to manage Object Lock 
permissions on OBS buckets.
+Meanwhile, to accelerate core feature delivery, we have decided to exclude 
complex multi-version locking (Versioning Lock) 
+and legacy FSO buckets from this initial release. In addition, support for 
Native ACLs is excluded; Native ACLs typically grant permissions 
+at the granular bucket or object level, whereas Object Lock permission 
management favors broad, role-based authorization,
+creating a conflict in design philosophies. Narrowing the scope allows us to 
focus on the core functionality and ensure a rapid, 
+stable rollout of baseline tamper-proof protection.
+
+**Goal:**
+
+* Implement the Object Lock feature on standard OBS buckets, fully integrated 
with Ranger for permission and access control. 
+* Support single-version objects only.
+
+## Non-Goal
+
+* Versioning Lock: Support for locking across multiple object versions is 
deferred (multi-version core features are currently under development).
+* FSO Legacy Buckets: Object Lock support for legacy FSO buckets is excluded.
+* Native ACL Support: Native ACLs will not be used for access control or 
advanced configuration such as Retention Mode (Governance); access management 
is centralized exclusively via Ranger.
+
+## 5. Technical Description
+
+### Terminology
+
+**Legal Hold**
+
+* **Definition**: Applies an indefinite lock status to an object. The object 
remains protected until an administrator explicitly removes the lock (Remove 
Legal Hold). 
+* **Restricted Operations**:
+  * Put Object 
+  * Delete Object 
+  * Multipart Initial / Complete
+* **Allowed Operations**:
+  * Get Object
+  * Get Legal Hold 
+  * Put Legal Hold (Depends on permission)
+
+**Retention**
+
+* Definition: Configures a fixed retention duration (specified in days or 
years) for an object and applies a specific retention mode. 
+* Retention Modes:
+  * Compliance Mode: The strictest protection tier. Once applied, no user 
(including root/admin) can remove the lock, shorten the duration, or overwrite 
the object before the retention period expires. 
+  * Governance Mode: A flexible protection tier. Standard users are restricted 
by locking rules, but users with bypassgovernance permissions can bypass 
restrictions to perform modifications or deletions.
+* Restricted Operations:
+  * Put Object 
+  * Delete Object 
+  * Multipart Initial/Complete 
+  * Set Retention Period
+* Allowed Operations:
+  * Get Object
+
+> _**Note**:
+> * Background & Root Cause: A prerequisite for enabling WORM (Write Once, 
Read Many) in AWS S3 is that Object Versioning must be enabled. Under S3 
architecture, executing a Put on a locked object generates a new version 
without affecting the protected prior version; thus, S3 Object Lock primarily 
restricts Delete Object. 
+> * Ozone Implementation Status: Because Ozone's versioning feature is still 
under development, to guarantee absolute immutability during the lock period, 
Ozone will directly block and reject all overwrite operations (such as any form 
of Put or overwrite) on locked objects.
+
+### Table Changes
+
+**Bucket Table**
+
+Two new fields: objectLockEnabled & defaultRetention.
+
+```protobuf
+  message BucketInfo {
+  // ... existing fields
+  required bool objectLockEnabled = 24 [default = false];
+  optional RetentionConfig defaultRetention = 25;
+  }
+  
+  message RetentionConfig {
+  optional RetentionMode retentionMode = 23;
+  optional uint64 retainUntilDate = 24;
+  }
+  
+  enum RetentionMode {
+    GOVERNANCE = 1;
+    COMPLIANCE = 2;
+  }
+```
+
+
+
+**Key Table**
+
+Two new fields: retentionConfig & legalHold.
+
+```protobuf
+  message KeyInfo {
+  // ... existing fields
+  optional RetentionConfig retentionConfig = 23;
+  optional bool legalHold = 24 [default = false];
+  }
+```
+
+
+
+### Ranger Access Control
+
+Ozone Object Lock enforces a dual-gate mechanism combining **Ranger 
authorization checks** and **underlying WORM state validation**:
+
+* **Standard Data Operations (Put / Delete)**: Even if a user is granted 
Ranger `WRITE` or `DELETE` permissions, the operation is immediately denied 
with a `403 Access Denied` (`WORMProtectionException`) if the target object is 
actively locked by an unexpired retention period or an active Legal Hold.
+* **Lock Management and Bypass Authorization**: To adhere to the Principle of 
The Least Privilege, dedicated Ranger Access Types are introduced to govern 
Legal Hold state transitions and Governance Mode bypass privileges:
+
+#### 1. Legal Hold Access Control
+
+Three dedicated Access Types are added to `accessTypeRestrictions` at the Key 
level to govern Legal Hold states:
+
+* **`GET_LEGAL_HOLD`**: Allows querying the current Legal Hold status of an 
object (maps to the `GetObjectLegalHold` API).
+* **`PUT_LEGAL_HOLD`**: Grants permission to apply a Legal Hold to an object 
(maps to `PutObjectLegalHold` with status ON). Once applied, the object is 
locked indefinitely, blocking all overwrite and delete operations.
+* **`CLEAR_LEGAL_HOLD`**: Grants permission to remove a Legal Hold from an 
object (maps to `PutObjectLegalHold` with status OFF). Because this clears 
immutability protection, it is treated as a high-privilege action restricted 
only to authorized users.

Review Comment:
   hi all - you won't need to create new access types for this.  From the STS 
project, the concept of actions are created in Ranger, which map exactly to the 
AWS actions without the `s3:` prefix.   From the AWS documentation 
(https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/object-lock.html), there 
are 6 new actions:
   
   ```
   s3:BypassGovernanceRetention
   s3:GetBucketObjectLockConfiguration
   s3:GetObjectLegalHold
   s3:GetObjectRetention
   s3:PutBucketObjectLockConfiguration
   s3:PutObjectLegalHold
   s3:PutObjectRetention
   ```
   
   so in Ranger these would be:
   
   ```
   BypassGovernanceRetention
   GetBucketObjectLockConfiguration
   GetObjectLegalHold
   GetObjectRetention
   PutBucketObjectLockConfiguration
   PutObjectLegalHold
   PutObjectRetention
   ```
   
   For example, if you want the role to have access `PutObjectLegalHold`, you 
would grant `PutObjectLegalHold` action and `write` permission (i.e. access 
type) in Ranger.  Or you could grant `Put*` and `all` permission and get access 
to all the Put actions.



##########
hadoop-hdds/docs/content/design/s3-object-lock.md:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
+---
+title: S3 Object Lock
+summary: Design to support S3 object lock.
+date: 2026-08-18
+jira: HDDS-15945
+status: accepted
+author: Chung En Lee
+---
+<!--
+  Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+  you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+  Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+  distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+  WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+  See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+  limitations under the License. See accompanying LICENSE file.
+-->
+
+# S3 Object Lock Design Doc
+
+## Summary
+
+This design document aims to plan and implement the Object Lock mechanism for 
OBS buckets integrated with Ranger.
+The primary objective is to provide data immutability and tamper-proof 
protection through the object locking feature.
+
+## Problem statement
+
+With growing demands for data security and compliance, ensuring that critical 
data stored in OBS (Object Storage) is
+protected from accidental or malicious deletion and overwriting has become an 
essential system protection requirement.
+To establish a more rigorous data protection mechanism, we plan to introduce 
the Object Lock feature.
+
+Considering the current system architecture and access control strategies,
+this design integrates with existing Apache Ranger to manage Object Lock 
permissions on OBS buckets.
+Meanwhile, to accelerate core feature delivery, we have decided to exclude 
complex multi-version locking (Versioning Lock) 
+and legacy FSO buckets from this initial release. In addition, support for 
Native ACLs is excluded; Native ACLs typically grant permissions 
+at the granular bucket or object level, whereas Object Lock permission 
management favors broad, role-based authorization,
+creating a conflict in design philosophies. Narrowing the scope allows us to 
focus on the core functionality and ensure a rapid, 
+stable rollout of baseline tamper-proof protection.
+
+**Goal:**
+
+* Implement the Object Lock feature on standard OBS buckets, fully integrated 
with Ranger for permission and access control. 
+* Support single-version objects only.
+
+## Non-Goal
+
+* Versioning Lock: Support for locking across multiple object versions is 
deferred (multi-version core features are currently under development).
+* FSO Legacy Buckets: Object Lock support for legacy FSO buckets is excluded.
+* Native ACL Support: Native ACLs will not be used for access control or 
advanced configuration such as Retention Mode (Governance); access management 
is centralized exclusively via Ranger.
+
+## 5. Technical Description
+
+### Terminology
+
+**Legal Hold**
+
+* **Definition**: Applies an indefinite lock status to an object. The object 
remains protected until an administrator explicitly removes the lock (Remove 
Legal Hold). 
+* **Restricted Operations**:
+  * Put Object 
+  * Delete Object 
+  * Multipart Initial / Complete
+* **Allowed Operations**:
+  * Get Object
+  * Get Legal Hold 
+  * Put Legal Hold (Depends on permission)
+
+**Retention**
+
+* Definition: Configures a fixed retention duration (specified in days or 
years) for an object and applies a specific retention mode. 
+* Retention Modes:
+  * Compliance Mode: The strictest protection tier. Once applied, no user 
(including root/admin) can remove the lock, shorten the duration, or overwrite 
the object before the retention period expires. 
+  * Governance Mode: A flexible protection tier. Standard users are restricted 
by locking rules, but users with bypassgovernance permissions can bypass 
restrictions to perform modifications or deletions.
+* Restricted Operations:
+  * Put Object 
+  * Delete Object 
+  * Multipart Initial/Complete 
+  * Set Retention Period
+* Allowed Operations:
+  * Get Object
+
+> _**Note**:
+> * Background & Root Cause: A prerequisite for enabling WORM (Write Once, 
Read Many) in AWS S3 is that Object Versioning must be enabled. Under S3 
architecture, executing a Put on a locked object generates a new version 
without affecting the protected prior version; thus, S3 Object Lock primarily 
restricts Delete Object. 
+> * Ozone Implementation Status: Because Ozone's versioning feature is still 
under development, to guarantee absolute immutability during the lock period, 
Ozone will directly block and reject all overwrite operations (such as any form 
of Put or overwrite) on locked objects.
+
+### Table Changes
+
+**Bucket Table**
+
+Two new fields: objectLockEnabled & defaultRetention.
+
+```protobuf
+  message BucketInfo {
+  // ... existing fields
+  required bool objectLockEnabled = 24 [default = false];
+  optional RetentionConfig defaultRetention = 25;
+  }
+  
+  message RetentionConfig {
+  optional RetentionMode retentionMode = 23;
+  optional uint64 retainUntilDate = 24;
+  }
+  
+  enum RetentionMode {
+    GOVERNANCE = 1;
+    COMPLIANCE = 2;
+  }
+```
+
+
+
+**Key Table**
+
+Two new fields: retentionConfig & legalHold.
+
+```protobuf
+  message KeyInfo {
+  // ... existing fields
+  optional RetentionConfig retentionConfig = 23;
+  optional bool legalHold = 24 [default = false];
+  }
+```
+
+
+
+### Ranger Access Control
+
+Ozone Object Lock enforces a dual-gate mechanism combining **Ranger 
authorization checks** and **underlying WORM state validation**:
+
+* **Standard Data Operations (Put / Delete)**: Even if a user is granted 
Ranger `WRITE` or `DELETE` permissions, the operation is immediately denied 
with a `403 Access Denied` (`WORMProtectionException`) if the target object is 
actively locked by an unexpired retention period or an active Legal Hold.
+* **Lock Management and Bypass Authorization**: To adhere to the Principle of 
The Least Privilege, dedicated Ranger Access Types are introduced to govern 
Legal Hold state transitions and Governance Mode bypass privileges:
+
+#### 1. Legal Hold Access Control
+
+Three dedicated Access Types are added to `accessTypeRestrictions` at the Key 
level to govern Legal Hold states:
+
+* **`GET_LEGAL_HOLD`**: Allows querying the current Legal Hold status of an 
object (maps to the `GetObjectLegalHold` API).
+* **`PUT_LEGAL_HOLD`**: Grants permission to apply a Legal Hold to an object 
(maps to `PutObjectLegalHold` with status ON). Once applied, the object is 
locked indefinitely, blocking all overwrite and delete operations.
+* **`CLEAR_LEGAL_HOLD`**: Grants permission to remove a Legal Hold from an 
object (maps to `PutObjectLegalHold` with status OFF). Because this clears 
immutability protection, it is treated as a high-privilege action restricted 
only to authorized users.

Review Comment:
   The mappings in Ranger for actions to permissions/access types are found 
here: 
https://github.com/apache/ranger/blob/master/security-admin/src/main/webapp/react-webapp/src/utils/actionRequirements/ozone.json.
   
   Also, please note that when STS is merged to master, the 
`IamSessionPolicyResolver` would need to get updated with the new actions as 
well as `S3GActionIamMapper`.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to