[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-15927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18125907#comment-18125907
 ] 

Siyao Meng commented on HDDS-15927:
-----------------------------------

Verification run complete. Both targets ran through the full Specula pipeline 
at Ozone 9fbf9ee0cb1bd2f5f5d437b6719ebbe5309351fb (Specula v1.1.0, claude-code, 
Claude Opus 4.8).

||Target||Effort||Result||
|om-snapshot-gc|high|HDDS-16464 (reproduced, High), HDDS-16465 (masked, 
Critical)|
|om-snapshot-defrag|high|No findings|

Both bugs are linked to this issue with the Testing link type. The run 
environment, coverage and per bug summaries are in the description. Resolving 
as Done.

> [Specula] Verify om-snapshot-gc and om-snapshot-defrag (Apache Ozone master 
> @9fbf9ee)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-15927
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-15927
>             Project: Apache Ozone
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Siyao Meng
>            Assignee: Siyao Meng
>            Priority: Major
>
> Formal verification for Ozone snapshot lifecycle
> h3. Coverage (Specula campaign ozone-9fbf9ee)
> Run environment: Ozone 9fbf9ee0cb1bd2f5f5d437b6719ebbe5309351fb, Specula 
> v1.1.0 (c6aa3dfa), claude-code Claude Opus 4.8.
> ||Target||Effort||Guidance||Result||
> |om-snapshot-gc|high|{{campaigns/ozone-9fbf9ee/targets/008-om-snapshot-gc/.prompt-extra.md}}|1
>  reproduced High, 1 masked Critical|
> |om-snapshot-defrag|high|{{campaigns/ozone-9fbf9ee/targets/011-om-snapshot-defrag/.prompt-extra.md}}|No
>  findings|
> h3. Bugs (link via "Testing discovered")
> * (REPRODUCED, High) HDDS-16464: an unfenced deep clean flag write clobbers 
> the purge driven reset, so a snapshot is skipped by the deep clean and its 
> reclaimable deleted keys are stranded for its retention. [om-snapshot-gc MC-1]
> * (MASKED, Critical) HDDS-16465: a non atomic dual chain update or restart 
> rebuild could give a surviving snapshot a different effective previous and 
> misdirect the adjacency reclaim filter, currently masked. [om-snapshot-gc 
> CR-4]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to