errose28 commented on code in PR #560:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone-site/pull/560#discussion_r4458600681


##########
docs/08-developer-guide/01-develop/05-upgrade-compatibility.md:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
+---
+sidebar_label: Upgrade Compatibility
+---
+
+# Developing for Compatibility with Zero Downtime Upgrade
+
+Zero Downtime Upgrade (ZDU) lets the internal components of an Ozone cluster 
(OM, SCM, Datanode, S3 Gateway, and Recon) run in mixed versions during an 
upgrade with no interruption to service. Additionally, Ozone provides a window 
where a cluster can be downgraded after the upgrade. Both of these features 
require every release to uphold certain compatibility guarantees; otherwise, an 
upgrade can silently introduce problems such as diverging OM state machines, a 
corrupted container replica, or a Datanode that is unable to re-register. This 
page is a practical guide to what counts as an incompatible change inside the 
cluster, and how to safely introduce such changes in each area of the code.
+
+The rationale behind the framework lives in the [ZDU design 
document](https://github.com/apache/ozone/blob/master/hadoop-hdds/docs/content/design/zdu-design.md).
 Read it if you want the full model. This page focuses only on day-to-day 
development.
+
+:::note Scope
+This page covers compatibility **between internal Ozone components** during an 
upgrade. External client ↔ Ozone-server compatibility is a separate concern.
+:::
+
+## Background
+
+### Vocabulary
+
+- **Apparent version**: The version a component is *acting as*. It is 
persisted to disk and determines both the API the component exposes and the 
on-disk format it writes.
+
+- **Software version**: The highest component version contained in the running 
code. This is fixed by the bits that are installed.
+
+- **Pre-finalized**: The state a component is in when its apparent version on 
disk is *less than* its software version. All old features work; new features 
are blocked; downgrade is allowed. Components enter this state when they are 
first started after an upgrade, and remain here until they are either 
downgraded or finalized by the admin.
+
+- **Finalized**: The state a component reaches when its apparent version 
*equals* its software version. All features are allowed; downgrade is no longer 
possible. Components enter this state after they have been upgraded to a 
pre-finalized state and then given an explicit finalize command by the admin. 
This transition happens while the cluster is running and the cluster is 
expected to remain operational during finalization.
+
+Any behavior incompatible with an old version's disk layout or API must be 
mapped to a version and disabled until its corresponding version is finalized.
+
+### Invariants Provided to the Developer
+
+To maintain consistency during zero downtime upgrade, the following invariants 
can be relied on by developers:
+
+1. **For internal client/server relationships, the server is always upgraded 
before its client.**
+   - The only exception is Recon, which is a client of OM but is upgraded 
ahead of it.
+   - This is maintained by the admin following the documented component 
upgrade order.
+2. **All internal components are running the newest software before 
finalization begins.**
+   - Ozone's upgrade framework provides best-effort enforcement of this 
invariant, but due to corner cases it ultimately falls on the admin to execute 
correctly.
+3. **For internal client/server relationships, the server is always finalized 
before its client.**
+   - Again, Recon is the only exception, since it finalizes before OM.
+   - This is fully enforced by the upgrade framework within Ozone.
+
+#### Upgrade Order
+
+Components are upgraded in the following order to meet the client/server 
version invariant:
+
+- SCM
+- Recon
+- Datanodes
+- OM
+- S3 and HttpFS Gateways (can be upgraded simultaneously)
+
+Feature developers do not need to account for upgrade orders that deviate from 
this when handling compatibility for a feature. An out-of-order upgrade is 
considered user error.
+
+#### Finalization Order
+
+Components finalize in the same order they are upgraded. Finalization is 
triggered by a single admin command and the cluster ensures the correct 
finalization order internally.
+
+- SCM: Finalized via Ratis.
+- Datanodes: Finalized asynchronously by SCM after it finalizes itself.
+- OM: Finalized via Ratis only once HDDS (SCM and all live Datanodes) have 
finalized.
+
+Stateless gateway components do not need to finalize since they have no disk 
state to manage on downgrade and do not communicate with each other. Their 
compatibility with the rest of the cluster is handled solely by the guarantee 
that the server they call remains backwards compatible with older client 
versions. Recon currently finalizes immediately on startup, although downgrade 
support for Recon may be added in the future.
+
+## Quick Start
+
+Within this framework, most incompatible changes can be handled by upholding 
two rules during feature development:
+
+1. **Components with the same apparent version expose the same API surface and 
persist data in the same format.**
+2. **For internal client/server relationships, the server remains backwards 
compatible with older clients.**
+
+When a change to API surface or disk layout must be introduced, a new 
component version must be added to gate the feature. To do this, first add an 
entry to the affected components' version enums:
+
+- 
[`OzoneManagerVersion.java`](https://github.com/apache/ozone/blob/master/hadoop-hdds/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/OzoneManagerVersion.java)
 — used within the OM Ratis group and reported to external clients.
+- 
[`HDDSVersion.java`](https://github.com/apache/ozone/blob/master/hadoop-hdds/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdds/HDDSVersion.java)
 — shared by SCM and Datanodes so SCM can orchestrate Datanode finalization. It 
is also shared with clients.
+- 
[`ReconVersion.java`](https://github.com/apache/ozone/blob/master/hadoop-ozone/recon/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/recon/upgrade/ReconVersion.java)
 — Recon's own internal disk-format version, which is currently not shared with 
other components.
+
+:::warning
+Do **not** add new entries to `OMLayoutFeature` or `HDDSLayoutFeature`. Those 
enums are frozen after the migration to ZDU's new versioning framework. Every 
new version goes into `OzoneManagerVersion`, `HDDSVersion`, or `ReconVersion`.
+:::
+
+```java
+public enum OzoneManagerVersion implements ComponentVersion {
+  // Previous versions...
+  MY_NEW_FEATURE(101 /*or next available version integer*/, "My new feature"),
+}
+```
+
+Most incompatible changes are handled by gating the new behavior on the 
component's apparent version through its version manager:
+
+```java
+if 
(ozoneManager.getVersionManager().isAllowed(OzoneManagerVersion.MY_NEW_FEATURE))
 {
+  // All capabilities of MY_NEW_FEATURE can be used, even if they are 
incompatible with older components.
+} else {
+  // Must continue to act as the older version without using incompatible 
changes from MY_NEW_FEATURE.
+}
+```
+
+`isAllowed(...)` returns true only once the component's apparent version is at 
least the version you name. Each component has a version manager with an 
equivalent method.
+
+:::warning
+It is incorrect to write the following:
+
+```java
+if (!ozoneManager.getVersionManager().needsFinalization()) {
+  // Use MY_NEW_FEATURE
+} else {
+  // Bypass MY_NEW_FEATURE
+}
+```
+
+New versions will continue to be added in subsequent releases after 
`MY_NEW_FEATURE`. Say `MY_NEW_FEATURE_2` is added in the next release. 
`needsFinalization()` is true whenever the component is pre-finalized for any 
newer version. A cluster that is pre-finalized for `MY_NEW_FEATURE_2` would 
therefore wrongly disable `MY_NEW_FEATURE`, even though that feature is already 
finalized.
+:::
+
+## Committing Changes
+
+Ozone's component versions are a logical versioning framework decoupled from 
official Ozone releases. The system is expected to work correctly regardless of 
which commit a release is cut from. To maintain this property, changes 
requiring versioning must be checked in within the same commit that introduces 
the version. Splitting this across multiple commits will create an 
incompatibility if a release is cut between the commits:
+
+1. **Incompatible: Adding an incompatible change and then adding a version 
gate for it in a follow-up commit.** A release cut between these two commits 
will release the incompatible change without the version gate.
+
+2. **Incompatible: Adding a version in one commit and using it in a follow-up 
commit.** Clustrers on a release cut between these two commits will finalize 
the version without the feature code. The next release's code then activates 
the feature with no version gate or upgrade action.

Review Comment:
   Oh there was an issue in the cspell configuration that has been missing 
spelling errors like these for a while: HDDS-17698. I'll fix the typo here and 
handle that issue separately.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to