wgtmac commented on PR #3750: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3750#issuecomment-5586728739
I’m not very familiar with this module, so please correct me if I’m missing any context. The fix appears to work for parquet-protobuf round-tripping. Could this lead to schema mismatches or otherwise surprising behavior for non-protobuf Parquet readers? Is this representation already considered an established compatibility contract because recursion truncation uses the same encoding? A short documentation note or cross-reader test would help clarify the expected behavior. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
