[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16980996#comment-16980996
 ] 

chenglei edited comment on PHOENIX-5494 at 11/24/19 7:57 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

[~larsh], seems that apply 4.x-HBase-1.4 patch to master failed the 
{{MutableIndexFailureIT}},such as:

[ERROR] 
testIndexWriteFailure[MutableIndexFailureIT_transactionProvider=null,localIndex=false,isNamespaceMapped=false,disableIndexOnWriteFailure=false,failRebuildTask=false,throwIndexWriteFailure=false](org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexFailureIT)
  Time elapsed: 14.087 s  <<< FAILURE!
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<x[2]> but was:<x[]>
        at 
org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexFailureIT.validateDataWithIndex(MutableIndexFailureIT.java:506)
        at 
org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexFailureIT.testIndexWriteFailure(MutableIndexFailureIT.java:369)


was (Author: comnetwork):
[~larsh], apply 4.x-HBase-1.4 patch to master failed the 
{{MutableIndexFailureIT}},such as:

[ERROR] 
testIndexWriteFailure[MutableIndexFailureIT_transactionProvider=null,localIndex=false,isNamespaceMapped=false,disableIndexOnWriteFailure=false,failRebuildTask=false,throwIndexWriteFailure=false](org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexFailureIT)
  Time elapsed: 14.087 s  <<< FAILURE!
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<x[2]> but was:<x[]>
        at 
org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexFailureIT.validateDataWithIndex(MutableIndexFailureIT.java:506)
        at 
org.apache.phoenix.end2end.index.MutableIndexFailureIT.testIndexWriteFailure(MutableIndexFailureIT.java:369)

> Batched, mutable Index updates are unnecessarily run one-by-one
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-5494
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5494
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.15.0, 5.1.0
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>            Assignee: chenglei
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 4.15.1, 5.1.1
>
>         Attachments: 5494-4.x-HBase-1.5.txt, 
> PHOENIX-5494-4.x-HBase-1.4.patch, PHOENIX-5494.master.001.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5494.master.002.patch, PHOENIX-5494.master.003.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5494_v3-4.x-HBase-1.4.patch, PHOENIX-5494_v6-4.x-HBase-1.4.patch, 
> PHOENIX-5494_v7-4.x-HBase-1.4.patch, PHOENIX-5494_v8-master.patch, 
> Screenshot_20191110_160243.png, Screenshot_20191110_160351.png, 
> Screenshot_20191110_161453.png
>
>          Time Spent: 5h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I just noticed that index updates on mutable tables retrieve their deletes 
> (to invalidate the old index entry) one-by-one.
> For batches, this can be *the* major time spent during an index update. The 
> cost is mostly incured by the repeated setup (and seeking) of the new region 
> scanner (for each row).
> We can instead do a skip scan and get all updates in a single scan per region.
> (Logically that is simple, but it will require some refactoring)
> I won't be getting to this, but recording it here in case someone feels 
> inclined.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to