[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17157587#comment-17157587
 ] 

Chinmay Kulkarni commented on PHOENIX-5958:
-------------------------------------------

This problem exists irrespective of the rollback config. It is probably because 
diverged views created by old clients do not have the EXCLUDED_COLUMN linking 
row and so after upgrading to 4.15+, those views are considered to be 
non-diverged. Ideally, we should handle porting all diverged views to the new 
design in the upgrade path and/or add logic on the server-side to figure out 
pre-existing diverged views that had been created via old clients.

Diverged views created via old clients can be found with some combination of 
the BASE_COLUMN_COUNT=-100 logic and comparing the columns present in the 
parent vs. child to find what are the exact columns that are missing in the 
child view.

[~yanxinyi] [~gjacoby] [~abhishek.chouhan] [~tdsilva]

> Diverged view created from an older client still sees dropped column data
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-5958
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5958
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.15.0
>            Reporter: Chinmay Kulkarni
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.16.0
>
>
> By "diverged view" I mean creating a view and then dropping one of the 
> inherited columns from the view. Steps to reproduce:
> Start a 4.x server and connect with a pre-4.15 (I tried a 4.14.3) client
>  # CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS S.T (A INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, B INTEGER);
>  # CREATE VIEW IF NOT EXISTS S.V (new_col INTEGER) AS SELECT * FROM S.T;
>  # UPSERT INTO S.T VALUES(1,2);
>  # ALTER VIEW S.V DROP COLUMN B;
>  # SELECT * FROM S.T; gives:
> |A|B|
> |1|2|
>  # SELECT * FROM S.V; gives:
> |B|A|NEW_COL|
> |2|1|null|
> Though the column 'B' has been dropped from the view. This does not happen 
> for a 4.x client. 
> The problem is mostly due to changes introduced by 
> [PHOENIX-4893|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4893].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to