snazy commented on PR #459: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/459#issuecomment-2497388047
> Hey @snazy I'm not sure I understand the intent of the question. This is the only change I have planned regarding dynamic configs, as this provides the hook necessary for implementors. My question is: what/who needs this change? My overall concern is it's going beyond a "simple" implementation. Maybe I'm a bit blessed as I'm used to what Quarkus and all its extensions offer for configuration via Smallrye-Config, where such things (various config sources, dynamic configurations, encryption, etc etc) are rather just available. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
