snazy opened a new issue, #777:
URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/issues/777

   ### Describe the bug
   
   As pointed out on the [mailing 
list](https://lists.apache.org/thread/obvrrh0w36f87rwljptzwonpt89qkcm1), the 
current persistence implementation in Polaris, even if run with the required 
isolation level, yields errors like `ERROR: could not
   serialize access due to read/write dependencies among transactions`. The 
underlying test case, which runs concurrent modifications to _different_ 
Iceberg tables (non-conflicting changes) and did not "overload" Polaris, should 
really _never_ yield such errors to users.
   
   This issue _could_ be a consequence of #775, assuming that the behavior of 
one persistence backend can be ported 1:1 to another one.
   
   ### To Reproduce
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Actual Behavior
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Expected Behavior
   
   _No response_
   
   ### Additional context
   
   _No response_
   
   ### System information
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to