[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17251406#comment-17251406
]
runzhiwang edited comment on RATIS-1249 at 12/17/20, 11:59 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
bq. My understanding is
bq.
bq. dn1 > dn2 -> dn3 might be slower compared with 1 ->2 1>3 when cluster is
not under heavy load because the second model writes to 2 and 3 in parallel? So
maybe it is better to leave client to decide which model to use?
[~szetszwo] Hi, what do you think of Rui's suggestion?
was (Author: yjxxtd):
bq. My understanding is
bq.
bq. dn1 > dn2 -> dn3 might be slower compared with 1 ->2 1>3 when cluster is
not under heavy load because the second model writes to 2 and 3 in parallel? So
maybe it is better to leave client to decide which model to use?
[~szetszwo] Hi, what do you think of this ?
> Add route table in RaftConfiguration
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-1249
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1249
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: runzhiwang
> Assignee: runzhiwang
> Priority: Major
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)