SzyWilliam commented on PR #925: URL: https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/925#issuecomment-1734914623
> Is there a good reason to use LINEARIZABLE not LEASE? I believe we have. LINEARIZABLE should meet most requirements in typical scenarios. It allows followers to handle read requests while maintaining strict linearizability. This will be the default and recommended option to use in IoTDB. LEASE is designed for situations where low latency is crucial, even at the potential cost of linearizability violations. The use of LEASE is mandated by Alluxio @codings-dan. His experiments have demonstrated that in a 3-node cluster, using LINEARIZABLE alone results in only a 160% improvement in throughput due to latency, whereas theoretically, it could achieve a 300% improvement. Nevertheless, IoTDB may consider employing this option if the potential benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Also, I added revoke mechanisms during leader-transfer / stepDown. PTAL, thanks! @szetszwo @OneSizeFitsQuorum -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
