[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ivan Andika updated RATIS-2497:
-------------------------------
    Summary: Dummy request should not trigger leader failover  (was: Pass 
server to the dummy watch request in OrderedAsync)

> Dummy request should not trigger leader failover
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RATIS-2497
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-2497
>             Project: Ratis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client
>            Reporter: Ivan Andika
>            Assignee: Tsz-wo Sze
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.3.0
>
>          Time Spent: 2.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> (Revised Description)
> We add a DUMMY message to the watch request. The server can detects it and 
> skips leader check.
>  - Checked the test that the read-from-follower client only talked to a that 
> follower and there were no failovers.
>  - This is a compatible change:
>  -- Old client -> New server:  the old client sends a normal watch request to 
> the new server.  It will be processed normally.
>  -- New client -> Old server: the new client sends a DUMMY watch request to 
> the old server.  The DUMMY message will be ignored  and the watch request 
> will be processed as a normal watch request.
>  
> ----
>  
> (Previous Title)
> Implement OrderedAsync improvement to remove dummy request
> (Previous Description)
> Currently the dummy request is a WATCH(0) which will trigger client leader 
> failover. In a follower read client scenario, this might cause client to 
> always failover to the leader which reduces the follower read effectiveness.
> {code:java}
> static OrderedAsync newInstance(RaftClientImpl client, RaftProperties 
> properties) {
>     final OrderedAsync ordered = new OrderedAsync(client, properties);
>     // send a dummy watch request to establish the connection
>     // TODO: this is a work around, it is better to fix the underlying RPC 
> implementation
>     if (RaftClientConfigKeys.Async.Experimental.sendDummyRequest(properties)) 
> {
>       ordered.send(RaftClientRequest.watchRequestType(), null, null);
>     }
>     return ordered;
>   }
> {code}
> One solution implement a new noop request (some kind of ping request) which 
> simply returns a successful response regardless of the Raft peer role.
> However, it might be better to address the long term TODO by fixing the 
> underlying RPC implementation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to