[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16135783#comment-16135783 ]
Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1894: ----------------------------------- Here are the results of testing the latest attachment https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12882963/SENTRY-1894.001.patch against master. {color:red}Overall:{color} -1 due to 3 errors {color:red}ERROR:{color} mvn test exited 1 {color:red}ERROR:{color} Failed: org.apache.sentry.provider.db.tools.TestSentryShellHive {color:red}ERROR:{color} Failed: org.apache.sentry.provider.db.tools.TestSentryShellHive Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SENTRY-Build/3163/console This message is automatically generated. > Update field size in package.jdo for dataNucleus to match size in sql > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SENTRY-1894 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1894 > Project: Sentry > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Sentry > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: Na Li > Assignee: Na Li > Attachments: SENTRY-1894.001.patch > > > The unique index > (`SERVER_NAME`,`DB_NAME`,`TABLE_NAME`,`COLUMN_NAME`,`URI`,`ACTION`,`WITH_GRANT_OPTION`)" > in `SENTRY_DB_PRIVILEGE` at package.jdo file is too large. When running > datanucleus schema tool, it complains > "com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Specified key was > too long; max key length is 767 bytes" > The size of the fields `SERVER_NAME`,`DB_NAME`,`TABLE_NAME`,`COLUMN_NAME` are > 4000, but the corresponding size in sql is only 128. > We should match the size defined in package.jdo to what's in sql script, and > remove `URI` from being part of the unique id. After those change, the > datanucleus schema tool finishes successfully with command "mvn > datanucleus:schema-create -X -e" -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)