[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16590900#comment-16590900
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on SENTRY-1896:
-----------------------------------

Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12936501/SENTRY-1896.11.patch 
against master.

{color:green}Overall:{color} +1 all checks pass

{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} all tests passed

Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SENTRY-Build/4071/console

This message is automatically generated.

> Optimize retrieving entities by other entity types
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SENTRY-1896
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1896
>             Project: Sentry
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Sentry
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Arjun Mishra
>            Assignee: Arjun Mishra
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: SENTRY-1896.01.patch, SENTRY-1896.02.patch, 
> SENTRY-1896.03.patch, SENTRY-1896.04.patch, SENTRY-1896.05.patch, 
> SENTRY-1896.06.patch, SENTRY-1896.07.patch, SENTRY-1896.08.patch, 
> SENTRY-1896.09.patch, SENTRY-1896.10.patch, SENTRY-1896.11.patch
>
>
> Right now when we get privileges from sentry, we pass in a provider like set 
> of groups. Then we create a MSentryGroup object for each group and then get 
> roles using the .getRoles() method. This is bad since we only need the 
> roleNames for the group and not the entire Role object.  
> Instead running a SQL like query and just getting roleNames will drastically 
> improve performance



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to