[ 
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-316?page=comments#action_38461 ] 
            
Gary VanMatre commented on SHALE-316:
-------------------------------------

Tom, I think that this issues was resolved with some changes I made yesterday.  
Both layouts rendered as expected - unless I'm missing something.  

GOOD LAYOUT:
content
      header
      main
          navigation
          content
      footer

BAD LAYOUT:
content
     header
     main 
         content
         navigation
     footer

   
The main content and navigation markup seem to be rendered in the correct div 
tags.
Please try pulling down the latest clay source.  You will need to make a couple 
changes due to the recent reorg.

web.xml

<filter>
  <filter-name>shale</filter-name>
  
<filter-class>org.apache.shale.application.faces.ShaleApplicationFilter</filter-class>
</filter>


pom.xml

<dependency>
   <groupId>org.apache.shale</groupId>
   <artifactId>shale-application</artifactId>
   <version>1.0.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>

BTW, this is a very cool example.


> tomahawk's panelNavigation2 doesn't keep state when navigating between views
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SHALE-316
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-316
>             Project: Shale
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Clay
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT, 1.0.3
>         Environment: tomcat 5.5.17, myfaces 1.1.4, tomahawk 1.1.3, shale 
> 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT
>            Reporter: Tom Pasierb
>         Assigned To: Gary VanMatre
>         Attachments: clayTests.zip
>
>
> I prepared an example which is attached to the issue entry. Use maven to 
> build the war or exploded app directory and run it. It should start fine. I 
> described briefly what goes wrong and what causes it in my opinion.
> Basically clay behaves differently if the order in which the panelNavigation2 
> and symbols are placed in the template file changes. This probably doesn't 
> explain much - just look at the example.
> I hope that the example I provided will be enough to correct the problem ;-)
> Regards,

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to