tomglk commented on a change in pull request #123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/123#discussion_r633062781



##########
File path: 
solr/contrib/ltr/src/java/org/apache/solr/ltr/feature/FieldValueFeature.java
##########
@@ -57,50 +67,79 @@ public void setField(String field) {
   }
 
   @Override
-  public LinkedHashMap<String,Object> paramsToMap() {
-    final LinkedHashMap<String,Object> params = defaultParamsToMap();
+  public LinkedHashMap<String, Object> paramsToMap() {
+    final LinkedHashMap<String, Object> params = defaultParamsToMap();
     params.put("field", field);
     return params;
   }
 
   @Override
   protected void validate() throws FeatureException {
     if (field == null || field.isEmpty()) {
-      throw new FeatureException(getClass().getSimpleName()+
-          ": field must be provided");
+      throw new FeatureException(getClass().getSimpleName() + ": field must be 
provided");
     }
   }
 
-  public FieldValueFeature(String name, Map<String,Object> params) {
+  public FieldValueFeature(String name, Map<String, Object> params) {
     super(name, params);
   }
 
   @Override
-  public FeatureWeight createWeight(IndexSearcher searcher, boolean 
needsScores,
-      SolrQueryRequest request, Query originalQuery, Map<String,String[]> efi)
-          throws IOException {
+  public FeatureWeight createWeight(IndexSearcher searcher, boolean 
needsScores, SolrQueryRequest request,
+                                    Query originalQuery, Map<String, String[]> 
efi) throws IOException {
     return new FieldValueFeatureWeight(searcher, request, originalQuery, efi);
   }
 
   public class FieldValueFeatureWeight extends FeatureWeight {
+    private final SchemaField schemaField;
 
     public FieldValueFeatureWeight(IndexSearcher searcher,
-        SolrQueryRequest request, Query originalQuery, Map<String,String[]> 
efi) {
+                                   SolrQueryRequest request, Query 
originalQuery, Map<String, String[]> efi) {
       super(FieldValueFeature.this, searcher, request, originalQuery, efi);
+      if (searcher instanceof SolrIndexSearcher) {
+        schemaField = ((SolrIndexSearcher) 
searcher).getSchema().getFieldOrNull(field);
+      } else {
+        schemaField = null;
+      }
     }
 
+    /**
+     * Return a FeatureScorer that uses docValues or storedFields if no 
docValues are present
+     *
+     * @param context the segment this FeatureScorer is working with
+     * @return FeatureScorer for the current segment and field
+     * @throws IOException as defined by abstract class Feature
+     */
     @Override
     public FeatureScorer scorer(LeafReaderContext context) throws IOException {
+      if (schemaField != null && !schemaField.stored() && 
schemaField.hasDocValues()) {
+
+        FieldInfo fieldInfo = 
context.reader().getFieldInfos().fieldInfo(field);
+        DocValuesType docValuesType = fieldInfo != null ? 
fieldInfo.getDocValuesType() : DocValuesType.NONE;
+
+        if (DocValuesType.NUMERIC.equals(docValuesType)) {
+          return new NumericDocValuesFieldValueFeatureScorer(this, context,
+                  DocIdSetIterator.all(DocIdSetIterator.NO_MORE_DOCS), 
schemaField.getType().getNumberType());
+        } else if (DocValuesType.SORTED.equals(docValuesType)) {
+          return new SortedDocValuesFieldValueFeatureScorer(this, context,
+                  DocIdSetIterator.all(DocIdSetIterator.NO_MORE_DOCS));
+          // If type is NONE, this segment has no docs with this field. That's 
not a problem, because we won't call score() anyway

Review comment:
       I think that's a great change, it really improves the readability!




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to