[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17412823#comment-17412823
 ] 

David Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-6910:
---------------------------------------

[~ichattopadhyaya] do you think you could review the PR that was submitted?  It 
seems pretty reasonable to me, but would love another set of eyes who have more 
experience in the distributed query paths review!

> deleteById without _route_ param for implicit router could be broadcast
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6910
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6910
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> A deleteById request without __route__ param for implicit router could be 
> sent to all shard leaders (Shalin). Alternatively, a new router (or a strict 
> mode for implicit router) that requires _route_ to be set for all 
> adds/deletes (Yonik).
> Some discussion here in SOLR-5890:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890?focusedCommentId=14236722&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14236722
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890?focusedCommentId=14264525&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14264525



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to