[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17463425#comment-17463425
 ] 

Michael Joyner commented on SOLR-14701:
---------------------------------------

Excellent, and yes, as an end user, I really don't like the automatic type 
guessing, among other things, if I have mistyped a field name type mark or left 
it off by accident, I end up with bad fields in the schema with bizarre errors 
later. Like trying to feed a String to a Date setter in the POJO during 
reconstruction. I actually would prefer an error be thrown if the type mark is 
left off or invalid so that I know something is wrong and that I need to fix it.

> Deprecate Schemaless Mode (Discussion)
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-14701
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14701
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Schema and Analysis
>            Reporter: Marcus Eagan
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: main (9.0)
>
>         Attachments: image-2020-08-04-01-35-03-075.png
>
>          Time Spent: 4h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I know this won't be the most popular ticket out there, but I am growing more 
> and more sympathetic to the idea that we should rip many of the freedoms out 
> that cause users more harm than not. One of the freedoms I saw time and time 
> again to cause issues was schemaless mode. It doesn't work as named or 
> documented, so I think it should be deprecated. 
> If you use it in production reliably and in a way that cannot be accomplished 
> another way, I am happy to hear from more knowledgeable folks as to why 
> deprecation is a bad idea. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to