[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17463742#comment-17463742
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-15209:
------------------------------------

Can someone sum up what the current default placement does, compared to the 
default in 8.11? Perhaps it is close enough to release 9.0 with it?

> Make the AffinityPlacementFactory the default placement plugin
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-15209
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15209
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki
>            Assignee: Ilan Ginzburg
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: main (9.0)
>
>
> Currently there's a lot of code in {{Assign}} dealing with the fact that we 
> still support the old "legacy" replica assignment as well as the new 
> plugin-based placement strategies.
> Furthermore, the "legacy" assignment is now the default even though it's 
> neither robust nor optimal, except in the very simple and small clusters. 
> Also, providing another plugin-based placement as the default impl. runs into 
> a small complication - in the absence of any plugin config the code reverts 
> to the "legacy".
> In order to promote the adoption of the new plugin-based placements we should 
> make the {{AffinityPlacementFactory}} the new default placement strategy, 
> selected when the explicit configuration is missing (and then create it as a 
> default configuration in {{PlacementPluginFactoryLoader}}).
> I propose to re-package the "legacy" strategy as a {{PlacementPluginFactory}} 
> so that it can be configured in the same way as other placement plugins.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to