[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17502609#comment-17502609
]
wei wang commented on SOLR-6910:
--------------------------------
Hi [~ichattopadhyaya] ,
Is there a fix available for implicit router deleteById without router.field
value ? The use case is so that the client can delete a document without
looking up an external kvstore to retrieve the route field value. I see
SOLR-15705 broadcast deleteById to all shard leaders for compositeId router.
Can we have a similar option for implicit router?
> deleteById without _route_ param for implicit router could be broadcast
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6910
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Assignee: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 2h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> A deleteById request without __route__ param for implicit router could be
> sent to all shard leaders (Shalin). Alternatively, a new router (or a strict
> mode for implicit router) that requires _route_ to be set for all
> adds/deletes (Yonik).
> Some discussion here in SOLR-5890:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890?focusedCommentId=14236722&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14236722
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5890?focusedCommentId=14264525&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14264525
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
