janhoy commented on PR #844: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/844#issuecomment-1120805121
> So in reference to [apache/solr-site#77](https://github.com/apache/solr-site/pull/77), we might be able to keep this line now? (Since all versions will be in the drop-down) I have thought the same thing. Sounds logical to end up with the start page of the latest guide when visiting `/guide`... Then we can remove that index page in solr-site. However, if we anticipate other guides (such as solr-operator and perhaps solr-exporter?) to be added later, I wonder if `/guide/solr/` would be a better "landing page" for the Ref Guide. Now, when you click the heading in top left corner of the guide, you are redirected to `/guide`, but if we also have `/guide/operator/` then it makes more sense to let that text link to `/guide/solr/`. Also, I discovered that the ref-guide places the JS, CSS etc in `/guide/_/` which will totally break down if we add other antora sites alongside it?? Or will the "operator guide" be a module of the same Solr Ref guide, pulled from a different git repo? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
