[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17585093#comment-17585093
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-16078:
-------------------------------------
Is this needed at all? What's wrong with the {{solrj}} module we have already?
We can can break it up as much as we like.
BTW if we end up deciding to move the source for solrj, I'm hoping it's delayed
closer to 10x to keep back-ports simple.
> New solrj-core module
> ---------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16078
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: SolrJ
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We should introduce a solrj-core module that is as slim as possible wrt
> dependencies.
> A user will then add solrj-core as well as any other solj-xx modules needed
> for their use.
> By marking it {{\@lucene.experimental}} we can change the API of this
> solrj-core during 9.x as we move stuff into other modules.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
