janhoy commented on PR #1094: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1094#issuecomment-1285467317
I have used streaming in just a limited amount client-side. And the number of classes was quite overwhelming. And a bit confusing to have all the backend classes also on the client. To be honest, I ended up using the low-level builders and constructing the expressions as JSON strings in my Java client. But it would be nice to get IDE help building more complex nested streams. So if it is possible to figure out what Bean classes and builders are needed on the client side, it would be a better end-user experience to get only those classes in `solrj-streaming`. In that case, the server-side classes could be a module for sure. Do you imagine the module would be enabled by default in 9.x and disabled by default in 10.x? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
